Legal Opinion

State v. Hassett

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1986No. 16176PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Steven Hassett pled guilty to first degree burglary and received an indeterminate seven-year sentence. After two months in the Idaho State Correctional Institution, Hassett moved to reduce his sentence under I.C.R. 35. The district court denied the motion without a hearing, and Hassett appeals. The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying Hassett’s Rule 35 motion. We affirm.

Our standards for reviewing a Rule 35 motion are well-settled. A motion to reduce a legally imposed sentence is addressed to the sound discretion of the district court. State v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. ArambulaIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. TorresIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. BeltranIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hassett v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. WrightIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State v. RoachIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. GarzaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. JohnsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API