State v. Wright
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Randy Wright pled guilty to forgery, a felony, and received an indeterminate seven-year sentence. After completing a drug and alcohol rehabilitation program at the Idaho State Correctional Institution, Wright moved to reduce his sentence under I.C.R. 35. The district court denied the motion and Wright appealed. The sole issue is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying Wright’s Rule 35 motion. We affirm.
A motion to reduce a sentence is addressed to the sound discretion of the district court. State v. Arambula, 97 Idaho 627, 550 P.2d 130 (1976). Such a motion is essentially…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. ArambulaIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. SuttonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. RundleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. LavyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. SimmonsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. BrydonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. KingIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. NickersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.