Legal Opinion
Arnesen v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided December 7, 1995No. 94-189PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Judge:
The appellant, Vietnam-era veteran Tore Arnesen, appeals pro se from a September 30, 1993, decision of the Boárd of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) denying an increased evaluation for postoperative residuals of chondromalacia with traumatic arthritis currently rated as 10% disabling for the right knee and 10% disabling for the left knee, with a combined rating of 20%. Record (R.) at 13. (“Chondromalacia” is softening of the cartilage in the knee, Dorland’s ILLUSTRATED MEDICAL DICTIONARY 326, 1241 (27th ed. 1988).) Both parties have filed briefs. For the reasons that follow,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- Fletcher v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Allday v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- Masors v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fenderson v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
- Tyra K. Mitchell v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011
- Velez v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- Robert H. Arneson v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011
- Roberson v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.