Legal Opinion
ABM Farms, Inc. v. Woods
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 29, 1998No. 96-1803PublishedCited by 213 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
Ohio and federal courts encourage arbitration to settle disputes. Kelm v. Kelm (1993), 68 Ohio St.3d 26, 27, 623 N.E.2d 39, 40; Southland Corp. v. Keating (1984), 465 U.S. 1, 10, 104 S.Ct. 852, 858, 79 L.Ed.2d 1, 12. Our General Assembly also favors arbitration. R.C. 2711.02 requires a court to stay an action if the issue involved falls under an arbitration agreement, and under R.C. 2711.03, a party to an arbitration agreement may seek an order directing the other party to proceed to arbitration. Likewise, the brokerage industry prefers arbitration. Arbitration has become a fact of life for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Haller v. Borror Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Beer v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by213 opinions
- Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Taylor Building Corp. of America v. BenfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Diamond Wine & Spirits, Inc. v. Dayton Heidelberg Distributing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Inland Bulk Transfer Co. v. Cummins Engine Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.