Legal Opinion

Beer v. Griffith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1980No. 79-56PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.

While we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals, our analysis is different. Before discussing the issues, we briefly outline some relevant facts.

I

The leased property included approximately 150 acres. As of the time of trial, lessee had drilled at least four wells on the property. One well was producing oil at all relevant times. A second well was dry. A third, Well No. 2-A, was near completion and apparently has production potential. Drilling on a fourth, Well No. 11-A, was terminated by municipal officials due to an error in lessee’s permit application.

Lessor acquired working interests…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Klott v. Associates Real EstateOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Schwartz v. Capital Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Coffinberry v. Sun Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Williams v. ChampionOhio Supreme Court · 1833

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. ABM Farms, Inc. v. WoodsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Diamond Wine & Spirits, Inc. v. Dayton Heidelberg Distributing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., Et Al.Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. American Energy Services, Inc. v. LekanOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Alford v. Collins-McGregor Operating Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API