Legal Opinion
Inland Bulk Transfer Co. v. Cummins Engine Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 17, 2003No. 00-4222PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Cummins Engine Co., Wart-sila NSD North America, Inc., Cummins Wartsila Engine Co., and Case Credit Corp. (collectively “Cummins”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to stay a case pending arbitration and to compel arbitration. Inland Bulk Transfer Co. (“Inland Bulk”) contracted with Cum-mins to purchase two naval propulsion engines. After some problems with those engines developed, Inland Bulk filed this lawsuit against Cummins, asserting claims of breach of contract, breach of warranty, negligence, and fraud. Cummins filed a motion to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Stout v. J.D. ByriderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Great Earth Companies, Inc., and Great Earth International Franchising Corp. v. Richard Simons and Kimberly SimonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- ABM Farms, Inc. v. WoodsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Tonya Cooper v. Mrm Investment Company, Terry Rogers and Larry MaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Judy Gettings v. Building Laborers Local 310 Fringe Benefits FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Fadya HuseinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Taylor v. KeyCorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Ansari v. Qwest Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.