Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Daniell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 2014No. 2013-1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Ric Daniell, of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0032072, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1978. In December 2012, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Daniell with professional misconduct for failing to properly prepare and maintain records of his client trust account and for failing to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation. Daniell and relator entered into stipulations of fact and misconduct, and as a sanction, the parties jointly recommended that Daniell serve a one-year suspension, stayed on conditions. After a hearing, a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrickerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. EynonOhio Supreme Court · 2013

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Adelstein (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BarberaOhio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Turner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. DaniellOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Winkfield (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API