Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Barbera

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2017No. 2016-1159PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Richard Barbera, of Medina, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0064044, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1994. In 2015, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Barbera with professional misconduct for mismanaging his client trust account and failing to cooperate in relator’s ensuing disciplinary investigation. Barbera stipulated to some of the allegations against him, and the matter proceeded to a hearing before a three-member panel of the Board of Professional Conduct. Upon consideration of the evidence, the board issued a report finding that Barbera had engaged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. DaniellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. EynonOhio Supreme Court · 2013

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Assn. v. Sullivan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Akron Bar Association v. Glitzenstein.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Barbera (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API