Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Eynon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 2013No. 2011-1422PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Ernest A. Eynon II of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0022392, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1969. In a two-count complaint filed on April 11, 2011, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Eynon with improper use of his client trust account and failure to cooperate in the resulting disciplinary investigation.

{¶ 2} Although the complaint was served by certified mail, Eynon did not answer it, and relator moved for default. A master commissioner appointed by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline found, by clear and convincing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. MaguireOhio Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Adelstein (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. DaniellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. BarberaOhio Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API