Legal Opinion
Plante v. Columbia Paints
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1992No. Civ. 920222PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford), has appealed from a district court summary judgment entered in a declaratory judgment action brought to determine the coverage provided by a Hartford insurance policy issued to Columbia Paint Company, Inc. (Columbia). We conclude that the district court erred in ruling that North Dakota law was applicable, reverse the judgment, and remand for entry of judgment consistent with this opinion.
On July 2,1987, Parnell Plante and Mark Sandness were severely injured in an explosion in the basement of a Mandan residence. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. RohdeWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Issendorf v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Castle & Cooke, Inc. v. Great American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Westman Industrial Co. v. Hartford Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Vigen Construction Co. v. Millers National Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kenna v. So-Fro Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Daley v. American States Preferred Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. WamsleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Schleuter v. Northern Plains Ins. Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Fankhanel v. M & H CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.