Legal Opinion
Issendorf v. Olson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1972No. Civ. 8775PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Judge.
The basic issue we are asked to determine in this case is whether the trial court erred in refusing to instruct a North Dakota jury on the Minnesota law of comparative negligence in a personal injury action brought by a resident of North Dakota who, as a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by a resident of this state, received personal injuries in an accident which occurred on a highway in the state of Minnesota. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we conclude that the trial court did not err in refusing to so instruct the jury.
The action was initiated in Cass…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Hataway v. McKinleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- First National Bank in Fort Collins v. RostekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Fitts v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.