Fankhanel v. M & H CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Delyle Fankhanel appeals the district court’s judgment, challenging the court’s order granting summary judgment dismissing Fankhanel’s claim for tortious interference with a contract. We affirm.
[¶ 2] In 1992, Fankhanel contracted with M & H Construction Company, Inc. (M & H), to construct the basement for a home. M & H excavated the basement and poured the floor and footings for the basement walls. Fank-hanel was dissatisfied with the work and refused to pay M & H, asserting the construction was defective.
[¶ 3] Fankhanel is an independent trucker who had been making…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Furlev Sales & Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Prysak v. R L Polk Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Sip-Top, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Ekco Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Ekco Housewares, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Kjesbo v. RicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hilton v. North Dakota Education Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Schneider v. SchaafNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Thimjon Farms Partnership v. First International Bank & TrustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Jacam Chemical Co. 2013, LLC v. Arthur Shepard, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
- Northstar Center v. Lukenbill Family Partnership, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.