Legal Opinion

Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wamsley

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2004No. 20030374PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Corey Wamsley, Jeff Wamsley, Joe Wamsley, Craig Wamsley, Kimberly Kinev, and Jamie Pfau (‘Wamsley heirs”) appealed from a declaratory judgment entered in an action brought by Nodak Mutual Insurance Company (“Nodak”) to determine Nodak’s obligations under insurance policies. We conclude the district court properly ruled this case is governed by North Dakota law and we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] While riding in their Chrysler in Montana, Alan and Sharon Wamsley, the Wamsley heirs’ parents, were involved in a collision when a vehicle operated by Lester Stanton crossed the median and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Swift & Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Stutzman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Zuger v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Schleuter v. Northern Plains Ins. Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Estate of CashmoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Wamsley v. NODAK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Riverside Park Condominiums Unit Owners Ass'n v. LucasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Denault v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API