Legal Opinion

Newcomb v. Schaeffler

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 24, 1955No. 17377PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

In the trial court plaintiffs in error were defendants and defendants in error were plaintiffs. We will refer to the parties as they there appeared.

Plaintiffs’ action was one for damages biased on alleged breach of contract. By the written contract sued upon, defendants agreed to erect a residence on certain lots owned by plaintiffs, “as shown on the drawings and described in the Specifications prepared by The Owners” and “to find, provide and furnish such materials of such kinds, qualities and descriptions, as shall be fit, proper and sufficent for completing and finishing all the work or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. White v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Moss v. Best Knitting MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Cramp & Co. v. Central Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Nance v. Patterson Building Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Western Distributing Co. v. DiodosioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Cohen v. VivianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Rohauer v. LittleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Little Thompson Water Association v. StrawnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  5. Kansas Turnpike Authority v. Edwin John Abramson and Emmett Johns, Executors of the Estate of John P. Abramson, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API