Legal Opinion

Neilsen v. Holmes

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1947No. Civ. 3476PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to set aside an agreement and for an accounting of the affairs of a partnership which operated under the name of California Carob Plantations. Judgment was rendered for defendants and this appeal followed.

Under date of April 20, 1920, an equal partnership was formed between the F. D. Cornell Company, a California corporation, and Lawrence Holmes for the purpose of developing, planting to Carob trees, and subdividing and selling a large tract of land in Riverside County, California. Some years later, part of this property was taken in eminent domain proceedings by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dennis v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Dugan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Parigian v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Sweitzer v. WithingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shank-Artukovich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  2. Roberts v. MarinerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Combs v. RitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Air Purification, Inc. v. CarleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Hargiss v. Royal Air Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API