Legal Opinion

Parigian v. Phillips

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1934No. Civ. No. 8954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a partnership to operate a meat market, and about a year afterwards plaintiff brought this action for its dissolution. He asked also for the appointment of a receiver, an accounting, and attorney’s fees. The defendant died during the pendency of the action, and the cause was after-wards tried and determined on the issues raised by the complaint, the answer filed by defendant and a supplemental answer filed by the administrator of defendant’s estate, who was substituted as party defendant. In the settlement of the accounts the trial court found,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heck v. HeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Sbarbaro v. RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Neilsen v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API