Parigian v. Phillips
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a partnership to operate a meat market, and about a year afterwards plaintiff brought this action for its dissolution. He asked also for the appointment of a receiver, an accounting, and attorney’s fees. The defendant died during the pendency of the action, and the cause was after-wards tried and determined on the issues raised by the complaint, the answer filed by defendant and a supplemental answer filed by the administrator of defendant’s estate, who was substituted as party defendant. In the settlement of the accounts the trial court found,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Heck v. HeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Sbarbaro v. RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Neilsen v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947