Legal Opinion

Glemby's Sons Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 25, 1926No. 2663PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

A silk piano cover and a velvet table cover embroidered and made in part of trimming, were classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York, as fabrics and articles composed in part of trimming. The goods were therefore assessed for duty at 90 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 1430 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:

Par. 1430. Laces, * * * burnt-out laces and embroideries capable of conversion into burnt-out laces, nets and nettings, embroidered or otherwise * * * tuckings, insertings, galloons, edgings, trimmings, fringes, gimps, ornaments; * * *…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pustet v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. GoldfrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Protest 179409-G of WanamakerUnited States Customs Court · 1938
  3. Protest 209324-G of Peter J. Barth Co.United States Customs Court · 1939
  4. Protest 259902-G of WanamakerUnited States Customs Court · 1938
  5. Protest 458559-G of KargereUnited States Customs Court · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API