Moscahlades Bros. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
The appellants entered nine importations of olives under the Tariff Act of 1922. They were returned for duty by the collector in each instance at 20 cents per gallon, under paragraph 744 of said tariff act, as “ripe olives not dried” on six entries, and as “olives in solution” on three entries. The importers protested, in each case claiming the goods to be dutiable under paragraph 749 of said act. The hearings upon the various protests were consolidated by the-Board of General Appraisers, and, after a hearing, the protests were-overruled, the board holding that the imported goods were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pustet v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. ConkeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. Stouffer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. CochranCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Delapenha v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Steinberg Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Costogue v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Bing Kee & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- Linhart v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.