Legal Opinion

Kroder Reubel Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 15, 1960No. C.D. 2186PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

An importation of brass pole rings was classified by tbe collector of customs as articles not specially provided for, composed in chief value of brass, in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec, 305, T.D. 51802, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 22i/í> per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiffs claim that the merchandise is properly classifiable as household utensils, composed of brass, and dutiable at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem within the provisions of paragraph…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Kubie v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Dorf International, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Anderson Heating, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. Roberto Colon Machinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. C. H. Powell Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API