Legal Opinion
In re Spiller
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided August 8, 1974No. Patent Appeal No. 9174PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, affirming the rejection of claims 1-7 and 9-31 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the rejection of claims 30-31 under 35 U.S.C. § 102, and the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112 of claims 1-2, 4-7, 9-11, and 19-23, of application serial No. 607,418, filed January 5, 1967, for “Manufacture of Paper and Similar Cellulosic Materials of Modified Surface Property by Electrostatic Application of Dry Powdered Starch to the Water-Wet Web Being Processed.” We reverse in part and affirm in part.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Application of Guido H. Stempel, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Application of Carl F. Swinehart and Marko SfiligojCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Charles T. FuettererCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Willie Fong, Wilfred H. Ward, and Harold P. LundgrenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- In re ConleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hazeltine Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- In re ScheiberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Wetmore v. QuickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Catalyst Research Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
- In re BorkowskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.