Legal Opinion

In re Borkowski

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 27, 1974No. Patent Appeal No. 74-564PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-14 and 24-32 in appellants’ application serial No. 621,379, filed January 23, 1967,1 entitled “Chlorination of Hydrocarbons.” A Rule 131 affidavit submitted to antedate the sole prior art patent on which the rejection was based was held inadequate. We affirm.

The Invention

Claim 1 illustrates appellants’ invention :

1. Method of chlorinating a hydrocarbon which comprises(a) feeding hydrocarbon in vapor phase at an intermediate level…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Application of Robert J. HarryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  2. Application of Thomas F. FaciusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  3. Application of Dwin R. Craig and John N. StreetCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  4. Application of Earl Phillip Moore. Application of Harold M. Pitt and Harry BenderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  5. In re SpillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re: SteedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. In re EickmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. In re VossCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  4. In Re Robert T. BassCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. In re CarreiraCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API