In re Borkowski
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-14 and 24-32 in appellants’ application serial No. 621,379, filed January 23, 1967,1 entitled “Chlorination of Hydrocarbons.” A Rule 131 affidavit submitted to antedate the sole prior art patent on which the rejection was based was held inadequate. We affirm.
The Invention
Claim 1 illustrates appellants’ invention :
1. Method of chlorinating a hydrocarbon which comprises(a) feeding hydrocarbon in vapor phase at an intermediate level…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Application of Robert J. HarryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Thomas F. FaciusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Dwin R. Craig and John N. StreetCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Earl Phillip Moore. Application of Harold M. Pitt and Harry BenderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- In re SpillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re: SteedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- In re EickmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- In re VossCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- In Re Robert T. BassCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- In re CarreiraCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.