Legal Opinion

In re Conley

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 24, 1974No. Patent Appeal No. 9101PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-9 of application serial No. 721,955, filed April 17, 1968, entitled “Satin White-Clay Compositions and Methods of Manufacture,” for “indefiniteness” under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph. We reverse.

The Invention

The invention relates to paper coatings and results from the discovery by appellants of a seemingly simple solution to a well-known problem in the art of paper coatings. As appellants explain the prior art, it has long been known to provide paper coating…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. Application of Walter L. Borkowski and John J. Van VenrooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. Application of Robert E. Moore and Edward J. JanoskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. Application of Calvin M. HammackCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. In re CormanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ppg Industries, Inc. v. Guardian Industries CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Sandra Solomon v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  4. Plastic Container Corporation v. Continental Plastics of Oklahoma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. Sprint Communications Company L.P., v. Vonage Holdings Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API