Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Trilling

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 24, 1988No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 11PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Attorney Grievance Commission filed in this Court a petition for disciplinary action against Michael P. Trilling. Mr. Trilling has been a member of the Maryland Bar since December 1973. Pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9, this Court transmitted the charges to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County for a hearing, and we designated Circuit Judge Richard B. Latham to hear the charges. Judge Latham’s findings of fact are as follows:

“The Respondent, Michael P. Trilling, was served with a copy of the Petition for Disciplinary Action together with a copy of the Request for Admissions of Facts and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CockrellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BettisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BloomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MoreheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZdravkovichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API