Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 8, 1986No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 50, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

R0D0WSKY, Judge.

This attorney disciplinary proceeding concerns the misappropriation of substantial amounts of client funds.

Bar Counsel, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, petitioned this Court for disciplinary action against Bernard F. Goldberg (Goldberg), a member of the Maryland Bar since June 28, 1951. We referred the charges to Judge James C. Cawood, Jr. of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County for findings of fact. Two separate transactions are involved.

In the spring of 1984 Goldberg represented Mr. Sol Sheintal of Florida in the negotiation and sale of certain realty to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PattisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VelasquezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BoehmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BurkaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McBurneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SparrowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. HoppCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. KolodnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Goldberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. TrillingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API