Legal Opinion

White v. Weinberger Builders, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1976No. Docket 55304, 55305, 55339, 55346PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

I would affirm the decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board and the Court of Appeals. The Second Injury Fund should hot be subjected to a separate, independent hearing to determine whether the fund is liable for differential payments when the claimant and employer redeem all alleged potential employer liability by entering into a negotiated settlement where employer liability has been neither admitted nor adjudicated.

This Court’s review is limited to a specific legal issue which is of major significance to the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Michigan. The factual circumstances of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Felcoskie v. Lakey Foundry Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. King v. Second Injury FundMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. White v. Weinberger Builders, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Mead v. Peterson-King Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Derouin v. Director of Workmen's Compensation DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Stimson v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Arduser v. Daniel International Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
  4. Drapefair, Inc. v. BeitnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Romero v. Cotton Butane Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API