White v. Weinberger Builders, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.
I would affirm the decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board and the Court of Appeals. The Second Injury Fund should hot be subjected to a separate, independent hearing to determine whether the fund is liable for differential payments when the claimant and employer redeem all alleged potential employer liability by entering into a negotiated settlement where employer liability has been neither admitted nor adjudicated.
This Court’s review is limited to a specific legal issue which is of major significance to the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Michigan. The factual circumstances of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Felcoskie v. Lakey Foundry Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
- King v. Second Injury FundMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- White v. Weinberger Builders, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Mead v. Peterson-King Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Derouin v. Director of Workmen's Compensation DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
3Cited by34 opinions
- Stimson v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Arduser v. Daniel International Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
- Drapefair, Inc. v. BeitnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Romero v. Cotton Butane Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.