Derouin v. Director of Workmen's Compensation Department
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHolbrook, P. J.
This is an original action in mandamus brought by plaintiff Victor Derouin, against defendants, director of the workmen’s compensation department and the State treasurer, to compel payment of differential benefits from the Second Injury Fund for the balance of 800 weeks as ordered by a referee of the workmen’s compensation department.
Plaintiff-employee claimed for injuries occurring in 1963 and 1964 against two employers and filed a request with the workmen’s compensation department for a determination of his claim for benefits. A referee filed decision No. 1 on April 18, 1966, ruling that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Toan v. McGinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Roosevelt Oil Co. v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Commerce-Guardian Trust & Savings Bank v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- White v. Weinberger Builders, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- White v. Weinberger Builders, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- White v. Weinberger Builders, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- White v. Weinberger Builders, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976