Romero v. Cotton Butane Co., Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRUMAN, Judge.
This consolidated appeal from the granting of motions for summary judgment in favor of the New Mexico Subsequent Injury Fund raises a question of first impression with regard to the Subsequent Injury Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 52-2-1 through -13. 1 That question is: may a worker, who brings a workmen’s compensation action against his employer and its insurer and who also alleges his right to payment from the Subsequent Injury Fund, continue his action against the Fund following a settlement with the employer and insurer? We reverse and remand.
PROCEEDINGS
Each worker filed an…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. ByrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. GuerraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Vaughn v. United Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Wolfley v. Real Estate CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mayes v. Second Injury FundIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Duran v. Xerox Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Lea County Good Samaritan Village v. WojcikNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ward v. Fayetteville City HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
- Mares v. Valencia County Sheriff's DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.