Legal Opinion

Romero v. Cotton Butane Co., Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1986No. 9082, 9163PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRUMAN, Judge.

This consolidated appeal from the granting of motions for summary judgment in favor of the New Mexico Subsequent Injury Fund raises a question of first impression with regard to the Subsequent Injury Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 52-2-1 through -13. 1 That question is: may a worker, who brings a workmen’s compensation action against his employer and its insurer and who also alleges his right to payment from the Subsequent Injury Fund, continue his action against the Fund following a settlement with the employer and insurer? We reverse and remand.

PROCEEDINGS

Each worker filed an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. ByrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. GuerraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Vaughn v. United Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Wolfley v. Real Estate CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mayes v. Second Injury FundIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Duran v. Xerox Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Lea County Good Samaritan Village v. WojcikNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Ward v. Fayetteville City HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Mares v. Valencia County Sheriff's DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API