Legal Opinion

Mead v. Peterson-King Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1970No. Docket 6,981PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.

Plaintiff, Gilbert Mead, suffered the loss of both legs as the result of an accident while driving a truck for defendant Peterson-King Company on November 5, 1961. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Company, the workmen’s compensation insurance carrier for defendant Peterson-King, immediately commenced payments to plaintiff. Thereafter, plaintiff commenced suit against Associated Truck Lines alleging its responsibility for his injuries as a negligent third party. MCLA § 413.15 (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 17.189). Plaintiff prevailed in the third-party suit, and the claim was subsequently compromised for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Oleszek v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Cole v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. Gamble v. American Asbestos Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Albert A. Albrecht Co. v. Whitehead & Kales Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Halfacre v. Paragon Bridge & Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. White v. Weinberger Builders, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Modeen v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Banoski v. Moto-Crane Service, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Grogan v. Manistique Papers, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Hakkinen v. Northern Advertising Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API