Mead v. Peterson-King Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.
Plaintiff, Gilbert Mead, suffered the loss of both legs as the result of an accident while driving a truck for defendant Peterson-King Company on November 5, 1961. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Company, the workmen’s compensation insurance carrier for defendant Peterson-King, immediately commenced payments to plaintiff. Thereafter, plaintiff commenced suit against Associated Truck Lines alleging its responsibility for his injuries as a negligent third party. MCLA § 413.15 (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 17.189). Plaintiff prevailed in the third-party suit, and the claim was subsequently compromised for…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Oleszek v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Cole v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Gamble v. American Asbestos Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Albert A. Albrecht Co. v. Whitehead & Kales Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Halfacre v. Paragon Bridge & Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- White v. Weinberger Builders, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Modeen v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Banoski v. Moto-Crane Service, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Grogan v. Manistique Papers, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Hakkinen v. Northern Advertising Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.