Legal Opinion
Forbes v. Becker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 26, 1931No. 19899PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
This was an action to set aside a partnership settlement on the ground of fraud; for an accounting; and to recover an undivided one-half interest of an undivided one-fourth interest in an oil and gas lease known as the Miller Tiger lease, on a claim that the one-fourth interest was a partnership asset.
It was undisputed that on September 27, 1925, the parties, Mr. Becker and Mr. Forbes, formed a partnership as drillers for oil and gas, in which they were to share profits and losses equally, agreeing each to devote his time to the business, the plaintiff to draw wages at $11 a day and the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Denver v. RoaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Rogers v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Watashe v. TigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Sewall v. McGovernWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
- James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Rothman v. SilberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Yerzy v. LevineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Rothman v. SilberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Helmerich & Payne, Inc. v. KeeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.