Legal Opinion

Sewall v. McGovern

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1922No. 1037PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

The plaintiff in error filed for probate an instrument dated December 23, 1919, purporting to be the last will of Ellen Conroy, deceased, whose estate is probably of the value of $8000.00. Defendants in error, who claimed under a former will, filed written grounds of opposition, alleging (1) that the later will was not executed and attested as required by law; (2) that Ellen Conroy, at the date thereof, was not of sound mind, and (3) that the will, if made, was the result of the fraud and undue influence of proponent.

The petition for probate and the contest proceedings came…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Estate of LatourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Coffin v. . CoffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  4. Weston v. TeufelIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Miller v. LivingstoneUtah Supreme Court · 1906

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fuchs Murane v. GoeWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Anderson v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Forbes v. BeckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Matter of Estate of BrosiusWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Simpson v. Occidental Building & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1933

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API