In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Serstock
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Respondent is the subject of disciplinary proceedings brought by the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board which alleged income tax violations and misconduct for improperly dismissing or delaying disposition of traffic tickets while serving as Chief Deputy City Attorney of Minneapolis. A court-appointed referee issued findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations which included an indefinite suspension from the practice of law without right to petition for reinstatement for at least 2 years. We adopt the referee’s findings and recommendations.
The respondent, Emanuel A.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re MatteraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In Re Discipline of BunkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- In Re Application for Discipline of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against StromwallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against AndradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against AndradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007