Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Andrade

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 19, 2007No. A06-426Published

1DissentPage, Justice

I respectfully dissent, for two reasons. First, I find the court’s penalty of disbarment disproportionately harsh when compared with the discipline imposed for comparable offenses in the past. Second, I conclude that the lesser penalty of suspension followed by supervised probation would satisfy the purposes of attorney discipline proceedings, as we have articulated them.

The court begins with the premise that the presumptive discipline to be imposed, based on Andrade’s felony conviction, is disbarment, and that lesser discipline is to be imposed only when there exist “substantial mitigating…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Application for Discipline of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Application of SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re the Reinstatement of PETERSONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. In Re the Discipline of ScallenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State v. SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API