Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Stromwall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 6, 1992No. C4-91-580PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
By petition filed with this court on April 8, 1991, the director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board charged Mark H. Stromwall with two counts of professional misconduct. Thereafter the respondent stipulated to a temporary suspension from the practice of law pursuant to Rule 16 of the Minnesota Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (MRLPR) (1991). Following a hearing, a referee appointed by this court recommended disbarment. We also conclude that respondent must be disbarred.
The respondent was admitted to practice in 1977 and became associated with a large metropolitan law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Disciplinary Action Against FrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Matter of Discipline of ParksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Matter of Discipline of OkermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against BernardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against MileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992