Kopperud v. Cookson
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought by the indorsee of a promissory note given in consideration of the sale of a certain stallion. The defense is that there was a failure of consideration by reason of the false and fraudulent representations made by the seller as to the age, soundness, and procreative ability of the horse, and that “a pretended indorsement or assignment of said note was made by the said Norm W. Thompson [the payee] to plaintiff, but said indorsement or assignment was fraudulent and void; that plaintiff, at the time said note was indorsed and assigned to him, knew that the same was without…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eames v. CrosierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Blochman Commercial & Savings Bank v. MorettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Citizens' Bank v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- Witty v. ClinchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Smith v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Lister v. DonlanMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Allenberg v. Rapken Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Howland v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932