Legal Opinion

Howland v. Leonard

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1932No. Docket No. 998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

Plaintiff originally instituted this action against the defendants Ida Leonard, John Doe Leonard, her husband, and Charles Leonard, to rescind, on the ground of fraud, a certain contract entered into between him and defendants Ida Leonard and Charles Leonard. The contract whose rescission was sought was one whereby plaintiff had agreed to exchange an interest in a confectionery store which he owned in the city of Los Angeles for the lease, equipment and furnishings of a motion picture theater in the same city owned by said defendants. As consideration for the transfer to him of the theater…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pacific Acceptance Corp. v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Bank of Italy v. Welbilt Auto Body Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Kopperud v. CooksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Peaples Finance & Thift Co. v. Matthews Fruit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bramante v. KrugCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API