Legal Opinion

King City Union High School District v. Waibel

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1934No. Civ. 9378PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This action for declaratory relief was brought by plaintiffs for the purpose of determining the validity of a contract entered into with defendant. The trial court sustained the contentions of defendant and declared that the contract was a “valid and subsisting contract and binding upon the parties thereto”. Plaintiffs appeal from said judgment.

The trial court handed down a written opinion which correctly states the facts and which in our opinion correctly disposes of the question of law involved. We therefore adopt said opinion as part of the opinion of this court. It reads as follows:

“It…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tate v. School District No. 11Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. Cope v. County of SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Gardner v. North Little Rock Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  4. School District No. 9, Mesa Co. v. GigaxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Holtzendorff v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Board of Education v. GulickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
  4. Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API