Legal Opinion

Tate v. School District No. 11

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 3, 1930PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff, a school teacher, commenced this action in the Circuit Court of Gentry County on July 30, 1926, to recover of, and from, the defendant, a common school district in Gentry County, the sum of $720 claimed to be due and owing to plaintiff under the terms of an alleged written contract, dated December 18, 1924, whereby the plaintiff agreed to teach the public school of defendant school district for a term of eight months, commencing on the third day of August, 1925, for the sum of $90 per month, payable monthly, and whereby the defendant school district agreed to issue warrants upon…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Saleno v. City of NeoshoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Farley v. Board of Education of City of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Farrell v. School-District No. 2Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. Mayor of AldermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Burkhead v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Dye v. School District No. 32Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  2. State Ex Rel. Rothrum v. DarbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  3. Aven v. Steiner Cancer Hospital Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Hoevelman v. Reorganized School District R2 of Crawford CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Coonis v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API