Legal Opinion

Denio v. City of Huntington Beach

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1943No. L. A. 18172Published

1Opinion of the Court

22 Cal.2d 580 (1943)

E. C. DENIO et al., Respondents,

v.

THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, Appellant.

L. A. No. 18172.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Aug. 3, 1943.

Drumm, Tucker & Drumm and Ray H. Overacker, City Attorney, for Appellant.

Forgy, Reinhaus & Forgy for Respondents.

SCHAUER, J.

Defendant city of Huntington Beach appeals from a judgment, based on a jury verdict, awarding to plaintiffs $2,000 as attorneys' fees for services rendered to defendant under a written contract between the parties. After plaintiffs had partially performed the services called for by the contract, defendant city…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API