Rummelsburg v. McDonald
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
This action was brought to recover the amount alleged to be due on a promissory note and to foreclose a chattel mortgage given to secure the same. The demurrer to the complaint interposed by the defendants other than Painter was sustained and judgment was entered in favor of the demurring defendants. This appeal is from the judgment.
In so far as material to the questions raised by this appeal, the complaint alleges that at the times mentioned therein H. Rummelsburg and R. Rummelsburg were partners, “doing business under the firm name and style of H. Rummelsburg & Son, certificate of said…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Von Schmidt Dredge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Holden v. MensingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Davidson v. KnoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Lemon v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- MacLay Company v. MeadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Caspary v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Shillingford v. Benewah CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1929