Holden v. Mensinger
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Griffin & Carlson, J. M. Walthall, and John L. McVey, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment given in favor of plaintiffs in their action as contractors to foreclose their mechanic’s lien upon the property of appellant Mensinger. Plaintiffs sued in their individual capacity and as copartners doing business under the firm name and style of the Thomas Holden Decorating Company, a copartnership. Their lien claim was filed in the name and on behalf of the Thomas Holden Decorating Company, a copartnership. The material which they furnished and the labor which they performed were in and about the decoration of a theater erected on the appellant’s land.
Appel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Alaska Salmon Co. v. Standard Box Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Giant Powder Co. v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Clement v. British American Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Williams v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Case v. Kadota Fig Ass'n of ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Case v. Kadota Fig Assn.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Pneucrete Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Rudneck v. Southern California Metal & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- McDonald v. FiliceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.