MacLay Company v. Meads
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Sonoma County vacating a judgment as to a partnership. Emmett Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the’ opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order setting aside the judgment and default entered in favor of the plaintiff.
The action is for unlawful detainer, and was instituted on the twenty-third day of November, 1909, for the purpose of securing restitution of certain premises, situated in the city of Petaluma, Sonoma county, which were, by an instrument in writing, leased by the plaintiff to N. L. Meads, one of the defendants herein, for the term of one year from the first day of July, 1908, at the monthly rental of $75, payable in advance on the first day of each and every month during said term, and for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Simon v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Security Loan & Trust Co. v. Boston & South Riverside Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- In re ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Burdette v. CorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- L. C. Jones Trucking Co. v. Superior Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Potts v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Roberts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Fowler v. Continental Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
- Proctor & Schwartz v. Superior Court of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.