Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Knox
California Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1885No. 8621PublishedCited by 22 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calavetas County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
In the caption of the complaint in this action -the defendants are thus named and described:—
“ Richard F. Knox, Joseph Osborne, Samuel R. Ely, W. T. Robinson, and Philip V. R. Ely, copartners, doing business under the firm name of Knóx & Osborne.”
The averment in the complaint as to the relations of defendants to each other is as .follows:—
“That the said defendants, Richard F. Knox, Joseph Osborne, Samuel P. Ely, W. T. Robinson, and Philip V. R. Ely, now are, and during all the times mentioned in said complaint have been, partners and associates, doing business under the firm name of Knox &…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tay, Brooks & Backus v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by22 opinions
- Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Fazzi v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ellsworth v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- L. C. Jones Trucking Co. v. Superior Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- MacLay Company v. MeadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.