United States v. Sears
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 38904.
1Opinion of the CourtMoNtgomert, Presiding Judge
The appraiser in his answer to the protest in this case described the merchandise as metal triangles, used in orchestras, catalogued and sold as musical instruments, and commercially known as musical instruments. The exhibit consists of two parts, a metal triangle and a metal hammer, or striker, having a wooden handle. The protestant claimed the articles to be dutiable as articles or works composed wholly or in chief value of iron, steel, or other metal under paragraph 167, of the tariff act of 1913. The sole question in the case is whether the article imported is a musical instrument under…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. BernardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- United States v. Foochow Importing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931