Legal Opinion

United States v. Sears

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 1, 1916No. 1662PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 38904.

1Opinion of the CourtMoNtgomert, Presiding Judge

The appraiser in his answer to the protest in this case described the merchandise as metal triangles, used in orchestras, catalogued and sold as musical instruments, and commercially known as musical instruments. The exhibit consists of two parts, a metal triangle and a metal hammer, or striker, having a wooden handle. The protestant claimed the articles to be dutiable as articles or works composed wholly or in chief value of iron, steel, or other metal under paragraph 167, of the tariff act of 1913. The sole question in the case is whether the article imported is a musical instrument under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. BernardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  5. United States v. Foochow Importing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API