Legal Opinion

Blum v. STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 16, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 91-121PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOSS, Presiding Judge.

Appellants, State of Arizona, Arizona Department of Corrections (“ADOC”), and ADOC Director Samuel A. Lewis challenge the trial court’s ruling that an ADOC policy regarding inmate property violates Ariz. Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 31-228(A) and is invalid and unenforceable as a matter of law. We agree with the trial court that the ADOC policy is contrary to this statute and we affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1988, Lewis issued Internal Management Policy (“IMP”) 301.17 (“policy”) on the subject of inmate personal property. The policy was effective on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Schroeder v. HudginsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Libra Group, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Walter O. Boswell Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Yavapai CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Kiley v. Jennings, Strouss & SalmonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Higginbottom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. Mercy Healthcare Arizona, Inc. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Wareing v. FalkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API