Legal Opinion
Donnelly Advertising Corp. v. Mayor of Baltimore
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 21, 1977No. [No. 138, September Term, 1976.]PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C. J.
The primary question presented in this case is whether § 5 (g) of the Oldtown Urban Renewal Ordinance No. 760 of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (the City), approved April 7, 1970, requiring removal of all signs in the renewal area covered by the ordinance other than those identifying the premises on which they are located, is valid and constitutional. Appellants—Donnelly Advertising Corporation of Maryland, owner of advertising structures throughout the city on land leased or owned by it, and the Flaccomios, owners of Oldtown property leased to Donnelly—sought a declaration that the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Department of Transportation v. ArmacostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Tyler v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.