Legal Opinion

Enloe v. . Ragle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaRksoN, J.

A general demurrer will not be allowed. A demurrer must distinctly specify the grounds of objection or it may be disregarded. It may be taken to the whole complaint or to any of the alleged causes of action stated therein. C. S., 512. A demurrer to the jurisdiction or that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, will be treated as a motion to dismiss, and can be interposed ore terms at any time, even in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court may raise the question ex mero motu. Seawell v. Cole, 194 N. C., p. 546. In this Court defendant, in writing and ore…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Corp. Commission v. Harnett County Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Newby v. HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Frith v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Newby v. . HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Bank of ColeridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Brewer v. . BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Newby v. . HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Hood Ex Rel. Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Ruschoff v. WachsmuthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API