Legal Opinion

Newby v. . Harrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In August, 1883, the plaintiff and defendants entered into an agreement "to run a gin at G. D. Newby's house, jointly."

The defendants were to furnish an engine and fireman, and two hands to perform any work in connection with the ginning. The plaintiff was to furnish a house and gin and press, and three hands — fit up the gin and press and house at his own expense, but the defendants to furnish "the money, if the should need it, to run the whole business, at 8 per cent interest upon the amount used."

The plaintiff was also to furnish "his own oil and fixtures to engine, etc." The plaintiff was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Doyle v. . BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Enloe v. . RagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Owen v. Meroney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Newby v. Atlantic Coast Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Archer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Enloe v. . RagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Grabowski v. BenzsaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Grabowski v. BenzsaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API