Legal Opinion

Hood Ex Rel. Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. Love

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 30, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The question involved, in substance, is as follows: Where, in an action brought by the Commissioner of Banks against directors of a bank for damages on account of negligent mismanagement, the complaint enumerates in detail negligent acts and omissions of the defendants and alleges that such acts and omissions constituted a general course of dealing and systematic policy of neglect, wrongdoing and mismanagement, in which all defendants participated, and that such negligence proximately caused great losses to the bank, is the complaint demurrable? We think not.

The defendants contend that there…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Emerson v. GaitherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  2. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Fisher v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Corp. Commission v. Harnett County Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Bedsole v. . MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barkley v. McClung Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Gaffney v. . PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Bailey Ex Rel. Bailey v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API