Legal Opinion

Brewer v. . Brewer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 14, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaeksoN, J.

The defendant demurred ore terms after the return of the verdict, and before judgment was signed by the court below, on the ground that “the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.”

C. S., 511(6). C. S., 518, in part, is as follows: “If objection is not taken either by demurrer or answer, the defendant waives the same, except the objections to the jurisdiction of the court and that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.”

The law does not favor divorces, and in divorce cases more detail and minuteness is required in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. Martin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  2. King v. Norfolk-Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Enloe v. . RagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. . VaughanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. White v. . Comrs. of JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Crenshaw v. CrenshawMontana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Kiser v. . KiserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Lawrence v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API