Legal Opinion
City of Reading v. Feltman
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 26, 1989No. 1115 and 1131 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALLADINO, Judge.
The City of Reading (City), its mayor and its Police Pension Fund Board (Board) (collectively, Appellants) appeal from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County denying their motion for post-trial relief.
' The facts are not in dispute and they are as follows. In 1966, the City enacted Ordinance No. 49, which amended the City’s Police Pension Fund Ordinance, originally enacted on December 15, 1926. The 1966 amendment increased from 1% to 3% the deduction from a member’s gross salary and also mandated an additional 1% deduction from the pay of “married male…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hempstead v. Meadville Theological SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Jones v. MuirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Mauch v. Pittsburgh Pension BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Allegheny County Police Pension Fund v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- PETOW v. WarehimeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Denbow v. Borough of LeetsdaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Carroll v. City of Philadelphia, Board of Pensions & Retirement Municipal Pension FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Couy v. Nardei EnterprisesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Denbow v. Borough of LeetsdaleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.